Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZASTROW, Justice.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover medical expenses under an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). State Farm denied coverage under the policy because the plaintiffs had negotiated a settlement and signed a release and indemnity agreement for the third-party wrongdoer. The release was in violation of the subrogation clause of the insurance contract. The trial court held that the subrogation clause in the insurance policy was invalid, and the defendant has appealed from the judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bernardini v. Home & Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Auto Owners' Protective Exchange v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Demmery v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Damhesel v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Motto v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Porter v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Phillips v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- State v. QuinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Lovald v. McGreevy (In Re McGreevy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.