Legal Opinion

Matter of De Lucca

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1905No. L.A. No. 1470PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Cassius Carter, District Attorney, and W. R. Andrews, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an attempt, without, action and under the provisions of section 1138 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, to obtain a decision as to whether a search-warrant, requiring a search of the premises of respondent for certain property, and the taking of the same if found, already issued by the appellant, as justice of the peace, and in the hands of the sheriff of San Diego County, who was about to execute the same, was issued without jurisdiction and authority of law. The agreed case was submitted to the superior court of San Diego County by respondent and appellant alone, the officer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. I. X. L. Lime Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bailey v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Chick v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Roberts v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Steen v. Appellate Division, Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sonoma County Nuclear Free Zone '86 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Dean v. CITY COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API