Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Quinn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice

[¶ 1.] Quinn provided funeral services to indigent persons and received burial assistance payments from Pennington County. In addition to these payments, Quinn collected monies from other sources. *37The State alleges the failure of Quinn to refund payment to the county after collecting additional monies from other sources constitutes theft by deception. In a court trial based on a stipulation, Quinn was found guilty of one count of theft by deception based upon implied contract. We reverse because the stipulated facts fail to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the count as charged.1

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hamlin County v. Clark CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HurstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HerrboldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pennington County v. State ex rel. Unified Judicial SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Rapid City v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Heine Farms v. Yankton County Ex Rel. County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API