Legal Opinion

United States v. Pierce

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 28, 1989No. ACMR 8700048PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1041OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

The appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial on 8 January 1987. Pursuant to his negotiated pleas, he was convicted of larceny, wrongful appropriation, two assaults consummated by a battery, drunk and disorderly conduct, and two absenses without leave. This court found no merit in the error alleged by appellate defense counsel, or in the error personally raised by the appellant. On 30 October 1987, we affirmed the conviction and a sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for ten months, forfeiture of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HamiltonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. FlynnU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. MooreU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. FitzsimmonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. StricklandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API