Legal Opinion

United States v. Strickland

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 20, 1992No. ACMR 9102872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DELL’ORTO, Judge:

The appellant, pursuant to his pleas, was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of wrongful possession of amphetamines, wrongful possession of hashish, wrongful possession of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) with intent to distribute, and wrongful use of amphet*570amines, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (Supp. V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twelve years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HollowayU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. FlynnU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. ThompsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. DeWaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API