United States v. Flynn
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GONZALES, Judge:
Pursuant to her pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of larceny, wrongful appropriation, and obtaining long distance telephone services under false pretenses in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. In compliance with the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority suspended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. StricklandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. DireU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. ThompsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. DeWaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. Private E1 ROLLAN D. MEADArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. DireU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997