Legal Opinion

United States v. Flynn

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1994No. ACMR 9301866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GONZALES, Judge:

Pursuant to her pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of larceny, wrongful appropriation, and obtaining long distance telephone services under false pretenses in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. In compliance with the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority suspended…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. StricklandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DireU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  2. United States v. ThompsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. DeWaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. Private E1 ROLLAN D. MEADArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  5. United States v. DireU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API