Greenspot Desert Inns, Inc. v. Roy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that defendants have accepted the benefits ©f the judgment and, therefore, cannot prosecute it.
Both parties have filed affidavits, arguments and extensive briefs. In their affidavits and briefs appellants have made frequent reference to the case of Roy v. Greenspot Desert Inns, Inc., - Cal.App.2d - [- P.2d -], pending here on appeal. Respondent argues that no notice can be taken of the record in that case because it is a separate appeal pending in a case separate and distinct from the instant ease. In the record before us we find a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Knight v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Cherokee Nation, and Its Attorneys, Paul M. Niebell, Earl Boyd Pierce, George E. Norvell, and Dennis W. Bushyhead v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- McCartney v. MeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Mathys v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Heintze v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Miller v. LobdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952