Legal Opinion

Wing v. Western Pacific R. R. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1919No. Civ. No. 2777PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit rendered against him in an action to recover damages for personal injuries. In granting defendant’s motion :for a nonsuit, the learned judge of the trial court stated the reasons therefor in the following language: “The motion for a nonsuit has been made in this case on the ground of contributory negligence of the plaintiff, and this motion,' in the court’s judgment, must be granted. There is no question in my mind "that the plaintiff was grossly negligent in his actions that night. His testimony shows that he came down from the synagogue, went…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hutson v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Antonian v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Klotz v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API