Legal Opinion

Department of Finance v. Union Pacific Railroad

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1940No. 6653PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

August 3, 1937, about 6:20 P. M. within the city of Twin Falls at an intersection of U. S. Highway No. 30, known as the “truck lane” and a spur or switch track of appellant railroad a collision occurred between a switch engine of appellant railroad being backed across the truck lane upon the spur track and a small panel delivery truck driven by Marcel Geisler, a minor employed by Geisler Beverage Company the trade name used by Frank II. Geisler, father of Marcel Geisler. The cause was tried before a jury, appellants interposed motions for nonsuit and directed verdict, which were denied, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Ernst v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Newton v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Sines v. AppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API