Klotz v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., denying a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff for $S00. On the question of contributory negligence cited Donaldson v. Milwaukee, 21 Minn. 293; Brown v. Milwaukee, 22 Minn. 165; Smith v. ' Minneapolis, 26 Minn. 419; Abbett v. Chicago, 30 Minn. 482; Rogstad v. St. Paul, 31 Minn. 208; Marty v. Chicago, 38 Minn. 108; Carney v. Chicago, 46 Minn. 220; Johnson v. Truesdale, 46 Minn. 345; Clark…
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., denying a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff for $S00. On the question of contributory negligence cited Donaldson v. Milwaukee, 21 Minn. 293; Brown v. Milwaukee, 22 Minn. 165; Smith v. ' Minneapolis, 26 Minn. 419; Abbett v. Chicago, 30 Minn. 482; Rogstad v. St. Paul, 31 Minn. 208; Marty v. Chicago, 38 Minn. 108; Carney v. Chicago, 46 Minn. 220; Johnson v. Truesdale, 46 Minn. 345; Clark v. Northern, 47 Minn. 380; Studley v. St. Paul, 48 Minn. 249; Miller'v. Truesdale, 56 Minn. 274; Magner v. Truesdale,…
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
Klotz, as administrator of the estate of Christian Hock-er, brought this suit to recover damages for injuries inflicted by the act of the defendant resulting in the death of Hocker. The accident happened on Center street, in the city of New Ulm. This street is 120 feet wide, and is one of the principal traveled thoroughfares in said city, which contains a population of about 5,000 people. The defendant, a railway corporation, has for many years last past owned and operated its line of railway from the city of Winona westward through said city of New. Ulm, crossing said Center street in close…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hendrickson v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- King v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Faber v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Magner v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Woehrle v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Wing v. Western Pacific R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.