Legal Opinion

Flower Hospital v. Hart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1936No. 24020PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Hart, seeks recovery for an injury received at defendant, Flower Hospital. Plaintiff was a paid in full inmate. One of the nurses, in the presence of two others who were furnished by the hospital, laid a light globe on the forearm and breast of the plaintiff while she was unconscious shortly after an operation and on the verge of death from heart failure, and while the only doctor present, Dr. Summers, was occupied in preparing or giving an emergency injection. Dr. Summers is not shown to be the employee of either party at the time.

The controversy is over the location of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Hogan v. Hospital Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Harris v. FallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. St. John's Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Strubhart v. Perry Memorial Hospital Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Fowler, Admx. v. Norways SanatoriumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Porter v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Swigerd v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API