Legal Opinion
Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 12, 1952No. 301PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
These two appeals challenge the constitutionality of Okla. Stat., 1941 (Cum. Supp. 1949), Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, providing for unitized management of common sources of supply of oil and gas in Oklahoma. This statute was repealed by the Oklahoma Legislature on May 26, 1951, Okla. Laws 1951, c. 3a, § 16, p. 142, and we ordered the causes continued in order to determine the effect of this repeal on the matters raised in these appeals. 342 U. S. 35 (1951). After being advised by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma that this repeal had no effect on these causes, we noted probable jurisdiction and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Calvey v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Superior Oil Co. v. FOOTEMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.