Legal Opinion
Calvey v. Daxon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 14, 2000No. 93,903PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 KAUGER, J.:
¶2 The dispositive issue presented is: whether House Bill 1574 1 and Senate Bill 165, 2 transferring monies from fee-generated funds 3 to the state’s Special Cash Fund, 4 violate the constitutional requirement of the Okla. Const, art. 5, § 33 5 that revenue bills be passed by a super-majority of each house of the Legislature or that they be submitted to a vote of the people. We hold that they do not.
UNDISPUTED FACTS
¶ 3 At the close of the first regular session of the Forty-Seventh Legislature, House Bill 1574 and Senate Bill 165 were adopted. The Governor approved the bills on…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Oklahoma Education Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma LegislatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- EOG Resources Marketing, Inc. v. Oklahoma State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.