Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
The question before us is the validity, when challenged by appeal to the Fourteenth Amendment, of an oil proration order promulgated by the Railroad Commission of Texas, insofar as it applies to the respondent’s wells.
To safeguard its oil resources Texas has devised a regulatory scheme for their production, and has placed its administration in the Railroad Commission’s hands. Revised Civil Statutes, Arts. 6014 et seq. In conformity with this statute, which has familiar procedural provisions, the Commission in the fall of 1938 issued the assailed proration order covering the East Texas oil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lemar v. GarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.