Legal Opinion

Devine v. McGowan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, C. J.

Plaintiff’s first claim of error refers to the form of the first question of the special verdict, which was as follows:

“At and immediately prior to the collision were the railroad employees negligent with respect to
*537“(a) Ringing the engine bell?
“(b) Lookout?
“If you have not answered subdivision (b), then answer this subdivision:
“(c) Sounding engine whistle?”

It is contended that subdivision (c) thereof with reference to sounding the engine whistle did not admit of a direct answer.

In the trial court’s written decision on motions after verdict it admitted that a mistake was made in the framing of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Webster v. RothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lisowski v. ChenenoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bergman v. HupyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McLaughlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. McLaughlin v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API