Legal Opinion
Devine v. McGowan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, C. J.
Plaintiff’s first claim of error refers to the form of the first question of the special verdict, which was as follows:
“At and immediately prior to the collision were the railroad employees negligent with respect to
*537“(a) Ringing the engine bell?
“(b) Lookout?
“If you have not answered subdivision (b), then answer this subdivision:
“(c) Sounding engine whistle?”
It is contended that subdivision (c) thereof with reference to sounding the engine whistle did not admit of a direct answer.
In the trial court’s written decision on motions after verdict it admitted that a mistake was made in the framing of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Webster v. RothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lisowski v. ChenenoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Bergman v. HupyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- McLaughlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- McLaughlin v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966