Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Barlow, J..
The question presented 'is whether there is evidence to sustain the finding of the jury that appellant Rail road Company was guilty of causal negligence in failing to blow its whistle as the train approached the crossing where the collision occurred. The jury found appellant kept a proper lookout and the engine bell was ringing continuously from the time the engine was twenty rods from the crossing until it reached the crossing where the collision occurred.
Richard Keegan and Marshall DeRemer were employed by the L. C. L. Transit Company, whose business was hauling freight for hire.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- White v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Guhl v. WhitcombWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Waitkus v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Peters v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Bellrichard v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeRousseau v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Glendenning Motorways, Inc. v. Green Bay & Western RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Hynek v. Kewaunee, Green Bay & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.