McLaughlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Scope of review. No party has raised any question concerning our jurisdiction to review the various portions of the order which have been challenged. Sec. 274.33 (3), Stats., permits an appeal from an order granting a new trial, and the order appealed from grants a new trial as to one element of damages. We have held that in the converse situation where a trial court sets aside an excessive verdict, orders a new trial on the issue of damages, but awards plaintiff the option of taking judgment for a reduced amount, fixed by the court, plaintiff may appeal from this order.1 On such appeals,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Koffman v. LeichtfussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Ricardo Trevino v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Ellsworth v. SchelbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Rixmann v. Somerset Public SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.