Webster v. Roth
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
The first question presented is whether Sugar avenue was a public-traveled grade crossing under sec. 25.16 of the Madison city ordinances, which is practically identical with sec. 192.29 (1), Stats. This question' was submitted to the jury in the special verdict and answered in the affirmative.
It appears that in 1906 the United States Sugar Company had a factory north of the railway right of way, and that Sam R. Miller owned lands south of the right of way. The sugar company was desirous of obtaining a shorter route for its patrons to reach the plant. On July 6, 1906, Sam R. Miller conveyed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Heddles v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Ewen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Piper v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Van Galder v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Bellrichard v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Devine v. McGowanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Reinke v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.