Elmer v. Vanderford
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Respondent, Harold R. Elmer, as guardian ad litem on behalf of his minor son, instituted this action to recover compensation for property damage and personal injuries sustained by his son when the motor scooter his son was operating collided with the rear of an automobile driven by appellant, Louis N. Yanderford. From a jury verdict favorable to respondent, appellant prosecutes this appeal.
The circumstances surrounding the accident, as derivable from the statement of facts, are somewhat obscure due to the fact that the witnesses in their testimony made references to drawings and illustrations…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Grange v. FinlayWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Mouso v. Bellingham & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Sewell v. MacRaeWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Day v. FrazerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Levea v. G. A. Gray Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Henderson v. PENNWALT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.