Legal Opinion

Levea v. G. A. Gray Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 28, 1977No. 3562-1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

A machinist, who was injured when the holding fixture portion of the machine he was operating failed, recovered a $175,000 judgment in a products liability action against the manufacturer of the machine. The manufacturer appeals.

At the time of the injury, the plaintiff David Levea was a machinist working at the Pacific Car and Foundry Company (Paccar) plant in Renton. The machine he was operating, known as a vertical boring mill, was manufactured by the G. A. Gray Corporation (Gray) for Paccar.

Among the products manufactured by Paccar are steel winch cable drums which resemble…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Rasor v. Retail Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Shelby v. KeckWashington Supreme Court · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Miller v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Miller v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. In Re Dependency of Penelope B.Washington Supreme Court · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API