Hawkinson v. Geyer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Respondents-defendants Theodore Geyer and Gloria Vlcek (defendants) appeal from the denial of their motion for a new trial or remittitur. Appellants-plaintiffs Mr. Archie and Mrs. Sophie Hawkinson (plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s order striking their claim for punitive damages. They also ask this court to modify the trial court’s judgment to grant defendants credit only for that portion of their special damages that were covered by no-fault benefits. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand in part.
FACTS
On November 20, 1981, defendants drove to Geyer’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Detling v. ChockleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- DeWitt v. SchuhbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Stenzel v. BachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- C.T. Ex Rel. Taylor v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Biswell v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Anderson v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.