Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Amundson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1984No. C7-84-490PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Respondent Anderson commenced this action against appellant Amundson for injuries arising out of an automobile accident which occurred October 13, 1982. Anderson amended her complaint adding a claim for punitive damages for the unlawful, reckless, willful and wanton misconduct of driving while under the influence. Amund-son moved for partial summary judgment claiming punitive damages are inappropriate as a matter of law under the facts of this case. The trial court denied Amund-son’s motion and certified six questions to this court pursuant to Rule 103.03(h), Minn.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hawkinson v. GeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Wilhelm v. RyanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Nhep v. RoisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API