Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1903No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Monroe; Lockwood, J. Case by William T. Hamilton against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff for an alleged inadequate amount, both parties bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The defendant’s passenger train left the track near Monroe, Mich., resulting in a bad wreck, and injuring one or more of its passengers, one of whom recovered a verdict, and the cáse was reviewed by this court. The outline of the circumstances can be found in the opinion filed in that case. See Whipple v. Michigan Cent. R. Co., 130 Mich. 460 (90 N. W. 287). The plaintiff in the present case was the engineer of the train, and he recovered a substantial verdict and judgment, from which both parties have appealed; defendant’s counsel contending that the court erred in refusing to direct a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Whipple v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Tangney v. J. B. Wilson & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whipple v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Schulte v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Whipple v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API