Legal Opinion

Tangney v. J. B. Wilson & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne. (G-artner, J.) Negligence case. Plaintifi brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. The court below directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that no. negligence on its part had been shown. There was no testimony given on behalf of the defendant, and the case rested upon the showing on the part of the plaintiff.

At the time of the injury plaintiff was 20 years of age, and had been in the employ of the defendant about five months. His duties consisted in making cores in a foundry for iron castings, placing them on a carriage,, pushing the carriage into the drying oven or furnace, lighting the fires, and adjusting an iron door…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wachsmuth v. Shaw Electric Crane Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Judis v. Borg-Warner CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Woods v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McIntyre v. Detroit Safe Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API