Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 29Published

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Case by Albert Schulte against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s trains on the night of December 6, 1906j to be carried from Yassar, Mich., to Detroit, Mich. When the train arrived at a point between Millington and Otter Lake a wreck occurred. The car in which plaintiff was a passenger rolled down an embankment and plaintiff was seriously injured. After plaintiff had put in all his testimony, the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict, which the court did, on the ground that plaintiff had failed to introduce sufficient evidence of negligence on the defendant’s part to require the court to submit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. Union Station Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Whipple v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hamilton v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API