Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Whipple v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1906No. Docket No. 7Published
Error to Monroe; Lockwood, J. Case by Sarah A. Whipple against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1ConcurrenceGrant, J.
The facts in this case and its companion case, Sarah O. Whipple v. Railroad Co., infra, being substantially the same as those in Hamilton v. Railroad Co., 135 Mich. 95, the majority opinion in that case must control, and I therefore concur in the conclusion reached by my Brother Montgomery.
I also concur in the views expressed by him on the other points determined.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hamilton v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903