Legal Opinion
LeRoy Construction Co. v. McCann
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1959No. Docket 34, Calendar 47,745PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
On March 6, 1955, the advertisement which follows appeared in the Detroit News, placed there by defendants Peter and Vera McCann:
“Thirteen 40-foot lots. Dearborn township, water and sewer. Public and parochial schools near. Call owner. TOwnsend 6-8077.”
Responding to this advertisement, a Mr. and Mrs. LeRoy Dunn, who were officers of plaintiff and ap-pellee LeRoy Construction Company, first called Mr. McCann and then went out to see him and the lots referred to above. The Dunns claim that there was no discussion of sewer and water prior to completion of negotiations about price and their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartka v. HartkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Merrill v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Jackson v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Borsvold v. United DairiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Dinius v. BolibrzuchMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Co. v. ZiomekMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. v. Fitness World of Jackson, Inc. (In Re Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Cole Lakes, Inc v. LinderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980