Borsvold v. United Dairies
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
This chancery dispute arose between vigorous partisans of 2 separate essentials of human existence — food and sleep.' On ' one side the unhappy chancellor was faced with the economic need of a bustling dairy to.-.start its milk trucks in the earliest hours of the morning. On the other side he was confronted by a plea for some relatively uninterrupted rest from the.home owners in the immediate neighborhood.
The trial judge may yell have had an ancient mariner’s views in mind: . .
“Oh sleep! it is a gentle’ thing,
Beloved from pole to pole!” *
for he ruled those activities of the dairy which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Hartka v. HartkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Bennett v. Consolidated Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Kobielski v. Belle Isle East Side Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Friedman v. KeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Smith v. Western Wayne County Conservation Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Haggerty v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- McQuade v. Tucson Tiller Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.