Legal Opinion

Borsvold v. United Dairies

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1957No. Docket 44, Calendar 46,964PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This chancery dispute arose between vigorous partisans of 2 separate essentials of human existence — food and sleep.' On ' one side the unhappy chancellor was faced with the economic need of a bustling dairy to.-.start its milk trucks in the earliest hours of the morning. On the other side he was confronted by a plea for some relatively uninterrupted rest from the.home owners in the immediate neighborhood.

The trial judge may yell have had an ancient mariner’s views in mind: . .

“Oh sleep! it is a gentle’ thing,

Beloved from pole to pole!” *

for he ruled those activities of the dairy which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hartka v. HartkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bennett v. Consolidated Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Kobielski v. Belle Isle East Side Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Friedman v. KeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Smith v. Western Wayne County Conservation Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Haggerty v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McQuade v. Tucson Tiller Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API