Dinius v. Bolibrzuch

This is an action to recover damages for fraud and deceit inducing plaintiffs to part with a valuable interest in certain real estate and accept, in exchange, an alleged practically worthless land contract interest in other property.

At the trial Mr. Dinius claimed that defendants Bolibrzuch and Stanko showed him a land contract whereby certain property had been sold for $22,000, and represented the property to be worth that amount “on the Detroit real estate market,” and the equity of Mr. Bolibrzuch therein to be of the value of $6,000, and that such representations were untrue and relied…