Cook v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff argues that the Industrial Commission erred in not finding that she was disabled by an occupational disease and entitled to disability benefits under G.S. 97-29.
In general, an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission is conclusive on appeal if the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and the conclusions of law supported by the findings. Barham v. Food World, 300 N.C. 329, 266 S.E. 2d 676, rehearing denied, 300 N.C. 562, 270 S.E. 2d 105 (1980).
In this case, the Commission found that plaintiff sustained a permanent injury as a result of her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Priddy v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Hundley v. Fieldcrest MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Harrell v. Harriet & Henderson YarnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Fleming v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Grant v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Fleming v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.