Legal Opinion

Hundley v. Fieldcrest Mills

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 8110IC1106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiff argues that the Industrial Commission erred in failing to award him compensation for disability caused by an occupational lung disease. Although we conclude that the evidence does not show compensable disability, as a matter of law, we agree that the opinion and award must be vacated and remanded.

A review of an award of the Commission is limited to two questions of law. We must determine whether the Commission’s findings are supported by any competent evidence and whether those findings justify the legal conclusions and award. Morrison v. Burlington Industries, 301…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Harriet & Henderson YarnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Niple v. Seawell Realty & Indus. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Grant v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. West v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Cook v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API