Priddy v. Cone Mills Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Plaintiff argues that the Industrial Commission erred in not finding that she was disabled by an occupational lung disease and entitled to disability benefits. Even though we do not agree that the evidence compels a finding of disability as a matter of law, we hold that the award must be vacated and this matter remanded.
As a general rule an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission is conclusive on appeal if its findings of fact are supported by any competent evidence and the conclusions of law are supported by the findings. Barham v. Food World, 300 N.C. 329,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harrell v. Harriet & Henderson YarnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Grant v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- West v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Cook v. Bladenboro Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Calloway v. Shuford MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.