Legal Opinion

Hinchman v. Wilson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1901No. 19,079PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Hinchman and others filed in the circuit court their petition for the improvement of a drain by the deepening and widening of Brandywine creek, under §5624 Burns 1894. Within ten days after kthe proceeding was docketed as a pending cause, not counting the day of docket*477ing and intervening Sunday, more than 200 interested persons, most of whom had been admitted parties to the petition upon their own application for that purpose, filed a remonstrance against the. proposed improvement, and requested its dismissal. Pending a hearing upon the remonstrance, and more, than four months after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sauntman v. MaxwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Noel v. Van FleitIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hamer v. EberhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API