Legal Opinion

Sauntman v. Maxwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1899No. 18,818PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, J.'

On September 10, 1896, appellants filed a petition for drainage under the act of 1885 as amended in 1889. Acts 1885, p. 129; Acts 1889, p. 285, §5622 et seq. Bums 1894, §4273 et seq. Horner Í897. The proposed drain would affect about 100,000 acres in Jay and Blackford counties and would pass through the corporate limits of the city of Portland. The method to be employed was the straightening and deepening of the Salamonie river. *117The petition named 2,763 persons whose lands would be affected, of whom 533 were nonresidents. Demurrer on the grounds that the court did not have…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Guetig v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lipes v. HandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Denny v. Des Moines CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API