Legal Opinion

Thorn v. Silver

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1909No. 21,333PublishedCited by 55 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Drainage proceeding by William Thorn and others, against which Henry C. Silver and others remonstrate. From a judgment for remonstrants, petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellees on August 13, 1904, filed in the clerk’s office of the Huntington Circuit Court their petition for a drain in Huntington county. On April 12, 1905, the commissioners of drainage filed a favorable report. Remonstrances were filed, for cause, and also one purporting to be filed by two-thirds of the landowners named as such in the report. The two-thirds remonstrance was withdrawn, and the cause went to trial March 18, 1907, on the remonstrances for cause, and after the hearing’ had progressed five days the further hearing was continued until the April term, 1907.

The drainage act of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Johnson County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
  2. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hunter v. MilhousIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Albert v. Milk Control Board of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API