Legal Opinion
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 1, 2006No. IP961718DFHTABPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AFTER REMAND ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Introduction
This patent infringement action was filed more than nine years ago. At the outset, plaintiffs asserted infringement of numerous claims under four patents relating to implantable cardiac defibrillators. A trial in 2001 on claims for infringement of four claims of two patents resulted in a verdict awarding plaintiffs $140 million in royalties for infringement of two claims of one patent, United States Patent No. 4,316,472. Following trial, this court resolved various post-trial…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Robinson v. ADVANCED DECOY RESEARCH, INC.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.