Legal Opinion
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 26, 2007No. 1:96-cv-1718-DFH-TABPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON POST-REMAND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Introduction
This long-running patent infringement lawsuit is before the court on motions for summary judgment on the issues of infringement and anticipation. As explained in detail below, the court finds as a matter of law that defendants’ devices infringe the one method claim still at issue. The court also finds as a matter of law that the remaining method claim, under the broader claim construction applied after the Federal Circuit’s remand, is invalid as anticipated by the prior art. The court is entering final…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michael B. Smith v. Douglas Lamz and the Village of Algonquin, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Clyde Ammons v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008