Legal Opinion
Robinson v. ADVANCED DECOY RESEARCH, INC.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 19, 2007No. 05CV1688 BTM (CAB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Randall Robinson (“Plaintiff’ or “Paten-tee”) received U.S. Patent No. 4,930,448 (“the '448 patent”) on June 5, 1990, for his invention entitled “Animal Toy.” The device consists primarily of a motorized mechanism by which an object rotates about a stationary base via an elongate rod. The basic idea is that an animal will be drawn to the spinning object and have some sort of pleasant interaction with it.
On August 26, 2005, Mr. Robinson filed a complaint with this Court alleging infringement of the '448 patent by Advanced Decoy…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Asmo v. Keane IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool and ManufacturingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Vekoma Rides Engineering B.V. v. Bolliger & Mabillard Consulting Engineers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025