Legal Opinion
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 2009No. 2007-1296, 2007-1347PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Sales Corporation, Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, and Anna Mirowski (collectively, “Cardiac” or “appellants”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granting summary judgment of invalidity of claim 4 of U.S. Patent 4,407,288 (“the '288 patent”). See Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., Inc., 483 F.Supp.2d 734 (S.D.Ind.2007) (“Invalidity Decision”). Cardiac also appeals aspects of the district court’s decision concerning damages. See Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.