Legal Opinion
In re Van De Loo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in January 1983. He was employed by an Albany law firm until his resignation from the firm on July 25, 1995. He maintained a solo practice in Albany for about eight months after his resignation.
*941Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, filed a petition and supplemental petition of charges against respondent. After a hearing, a Referee sustained most of the charges and specifications. Petitioner moves to confirm the Referee’s report and respondent opposes the motion.
By decision dated March 8, 1996 (Matter of Van De Loo, 225 AD2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re ReaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re SextonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re Van De LooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re PlimptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re PlimptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.