Legal Opinion

In re Plimpton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 2014Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997. He formerly maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Plattsburgh, Clinton County.

By decision and order dated April 17, 2014, this Court found respondent guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest and suspended him from the practice of law pending consideration of the disciplinary charges filed against him (Matter of Plimpton, 116 AD3d 1297 [2014]). We then granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the pleadings (see 22 NYCRR 806.5). We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re BalokAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re Van De LooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API