Legal Opinion
In re Cannon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1972. Effective November 28, 2000, he was suspended from practice pending his full compliance with a subpoena duces tecum and requests by *722petitioner for information and documentation (see, Matter of Cannon, 275 AD2d 860). Prior to his suspension, he maintained an office for the practice of law in the Village of Stamford, Delaware County.
Respondent now admits all of the charges and specifications in a petition filed in February 2001. As set forth in the petition, respondent neglected 15 estates that he was retained to represent, in violation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Van De LooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re SextonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re McQuadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re McQuadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re SheleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.