Legal Opinion

In re Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 6, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Warwick, Orange County.

Respondent was admitted to the New Jersey bar in 1983 and maintained a law office in that state. By order dated July 3, 2007, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred respondent for knowingly misappropriating client funds and engaging in dishonest conduct. Petitioner now moves for an order pursuant to this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.19) imposing reciprocal discipline.

Respondent argues that there was an infirmity of proof to sustain the finding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re Van De LooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. In re KarnazesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. In re KarnazesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. In re ZhaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Matter of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API