Legal Opinion

In re Van De Loo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

By petition dated January 19, 1996, petitioner Committee on Professional Standards accused respondent of failure to honor an escrow agreement, conversion of the funds of third parties, failure to account for funds coming into his possession and failure to produce records regarding same, and failure to establish a properly designated escrow account. By motion filed the same date, petitioner seeks an order suspending respondent pursuant to section 806.4 (f) (22 NYCRR 806.4 [f]) of this Court’s rules pending consideration of the disciplinary charges against him upon the ground that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Van De LooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re McGinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API