Legal Opinion

W. L. Lawrence & Son, Inc. v. Merkel

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 14, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

This is an action at law by notice of motion for judgment for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff below, defendant in error here, on account of injuries sustained by him in an automobile accident in which the defendant was charged with negligence.

There were two trials of the case. In the first trial the verdict of $100 for the plaintiff was set aside by the court on account of inadequacy of damages. The second trial which was upon the question of damages alone resulted in a verdict of $3,600 for the plaintiff which was sustained by the trial court.

We have before us…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. EppersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  2. Blackwood Coal & Coke Co. v. James' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  3. Omohundro v. PalmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. Hot Springs Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. RevercombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Richardson v. ShankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kornegay v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Potts v. FlippenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. Claud v. PulleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API