Claud v. Pulley

At the threshold of this case we are met with a motion to dismiss it from the docket because a large part of the evidence was taken ore tenus in open court before the judge, in chancery, and there is nothing in the form of a certificate or bill of exceptions, signed by him, identifying the evidence or making it a part of the record. That this must be done is made mandatory by section 6252 of the *469Code, as amended by Acts 1930, ch. 246, and section 6253 of the Code as amended by Acts 1934, ch. 90, and Rule XXIV of this court.

The following cases are controlling as to this point: Nethers v.…