Legal Opinion

Omohundro v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 16, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

The defendants in error have moved this court to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that certificates of exception were not filed in compliance with section 6253 (f) of the Code.

*695That section provides: “Any certificate to the intents and purposes of this section may be signed by the trial judge at any time before final judgment is entered or within sixty days from the time at which such judgment is entered, whether another term of the said court has intervened or not. The same rule shall apply when cases are heard or opinions are rendered in vacation, in which case the party excepting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Virginia Development Co. v. Rich Patch Iron Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  3. Bragg v. JustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Haisten v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Seay v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  2. Virginia Home for Incurables v. ColemanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  3. Armstrong v. BryantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. H. J. Heinz Co. v. W. B. Shafer, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Nachman v. Chatham-Phenix National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API