Legal Opinion

Kornegay v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1947No. Record No. 3130PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

On March 23, 1944, the city of Richmond instituted condemnation proceedings in the court below to acquire certain land, including the building thereon, owned by D. R. *1018Kornegay, located at the southeastern intersection of Forest Hill avenue and Westover Hills boulevard, in the city of Richmond, for the purpose of widening the boulevard. The proceeding was instituted under section 22 (b) of the city charter, Acts 1926, ch. 318, as amended by Acts 1942, ch. 252, p. 372. In conformity with the act the city, upon the institution of the proceeding, paid into the registry of the court, to the credit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  4. Bailey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Fonticello Mineral Springs Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ryan v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  2. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. GormanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. COMMONWEALTH TRANSP. COM'R v. Target Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. PickettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  5. Newton H. Ancarrow and Josephine Ancarrow v. City of Richmond, Newton H. Ancarrow and Josephine Ancarrow v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API