Legal Opinion

Burt v. Stringfellow

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1916No. 2872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. J). Lewis, Judge. Action, by John A. Burt against Arthur Stringfellow, and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The case is here on second appeal. Burt v. Stringfellow et al., 45 Utah 207, 143 Pac. 234. In the *331opinion in that case we set forth in full the contracts entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants, and upon which this action is based; and we shall not repeat the terms thereof here, except in so far as it may become necessary to a complete understanding of the points decided.

At the first trial the district court dismissed the action upon the ground that, as a matter of law, plaintiff could not recover a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Burt v. StringfellowUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Neighbor v. Pacific Realty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Gregory v. BonneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Butterfield v. Consolidated Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lewis v. Dahl (Butt, Garnishers)Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Porter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API