Legal Opinion

Madden v. Runyon

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-3754PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Patrick Madden (“Madden”) is a pro se litigant who alleges that the Postal Service discriminated against him and violated his constitutional and statutory rights. Defendant Marvin Runyon, Jr. (“Runyon”) is the Postmaster General. I construe Madden’s complaint, which consists of a single paragraph, to allege the ten causes of action listed below. I also indicate my disposition on Runyon’s motion for summary judgment as to each:

1. Retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. Marley v. DonahueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. Crumpton v. PotterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. McNeil v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Alba v. Housing Authority of City of PittstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API