Madden v. Runyon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Patrick Madden (“Madden”) is a pro se litigant who alleges that the Postal Service discriminated against him and violated his constitutional and statutory rights. Defendant Marvin Runyon, Jr. (“Runyon”) is the Postmaster General. I construe Madden’s complaint, which consists of a single paragraph, to allege the ten causes of action listed below. I also indicate my disposition on Runyon’s motion for summary judgment as to each:
1. Retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jenkins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Marley v. DonahueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Crumpton v. PotterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- McNeil v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Alba v. Housing Authority of City of PittstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.